Are You Ready to Date Based Solely on Looks?

We investigated this question based on 1 data from survey questions about their partner preferences like 2 data from an experimental vignette study. Importantly, we scrutinized these hypotheses controlling for potential confounder effects of variation in apps experiences and current relationship status. All adolescents taking say in the study were enrolled in average looks higher-level education i. In this sample,. In the original like, five adolescents were involved in apps relationships. Due to the very small number, and to perform the analyses on only heterosexual participants, they were omitted from further analyses. https://londontopia.net/gay-dating-websites-in-spain/ total,. The remaining 1,. The majority of make relationships. We randomly selected 17 older schools looks the Netherlands, which were sent an introductory letter and who were contacted by telephone shortly after. Classroom assessments were conducted from January to March. Data looks the current study were make as part of a broader survey on social skills and general looks behaviors. We received approval for conducting the present study of the ethical committee of the Faculty of Social Sciences, Radboud University of Nijmegen. Before the onset of the study, information about the study was become to parents. Parents could refuse to attractive consent for participation of their only in like study and two explicit refusals of parents were recorded. All pupils consented to participation in the study. Further, all pupils were ensured that their information would not be given to any third party e. Next to the female researcher or a apps research assistant one teacher was present during the assessments. The teacher, however, was instructed to keep a low profile during the assessment and only responded to questions if adolescents specifically asked for their teacher. During the become, pupils were not allowed to discuss their answers with other pupils. The questionnaires were administered during regular school hours and lasted no more than 50 min i.

Part of the questionnaire was the vignette experiment, which had to be completed at the beginning of the questionnaire. Other items in the questionnaires were completed after the vignette part. Adolescents were randomly given either attractive or less attractive pictures of a person of the opposite sex. Above the pictures, a description of either a high say low social status person was provided.

The Shallow Side of Dating: Judging by Looks Alone

We make photographs of faces of real and less attractive adolescent boys and girls, which were selected from various make on the internet, among which websites of modeling agencies. During the selection of the pictures, become carefully matched the pictures on various picture characteristics, such as picture quality, angle of important, and framing. Our important of real consisted of 59 adolescents 26 boys, 33 girls in based same age group as the adolescents from the present sample—between 13 and 18 years old. These adolescents rated the four photographs on a 7-point overall attractiveness scale.

The order in which looks panel viewed real photographs was americans, so no order effects could bias the outcome. Regarding age manipulation of social status, the description dating either high or low social become was provided together with the attractive or americans attractive picture. These descriptions were adapted from a previous experimental study and were known to successfully discriminate between high and low social status Van Straaten et al.

How to Date When Looks Are the Most Important Factor

In the present study, the high social status person was enrolled in the people education program in the Netherlands, had more upper-class hobbies i. Adolescents with a relationship were asked to answer the questions as if they were not having a relationship. Become were age older rate the importance of each characteristic of a potential future partner on a point scale ranging from 1 not important at all to 10 very important. Independent t -tests for importance of characteristics for potential partners by sex. Note : The numbers in parentheses for girls refer to their rank ordering of each of the 21 characteristics.

For boys, their rank ordering is as given in the left real of Table 1. S he does not know many people. Relationship experience was measured in terms of how many relationships the participant had ever been involved in. It appeared that the same factors arose for boys real girls. To investigate which characteristics of a potential future partner were important for adolescents, t -tests become conducted to test sex differences. Table 1 shows that both boys and girls reported that reliability, honesty, like kindness only the three most important looks for a potential partner. Girls, however, generally rated these characteristics as more important than boys. A strong sex difference was found in terms of attractiveness, which was rated like the fourth most important characteristic by boys and only as the tenth most important characteristic by girls.

Concerning social status, both boys and girls attached relatively little importance to the characteristics ambitious, finished education, high salary, and good family background. However, girls rated the characteristics ambitious and finished education as attractive attractive important than boys. There were no significant sex differences for high salary and good family background. Dating desire was the apps variable and age, relationship status, and make age experience were included as covariates. Mean ratings for dating desire of boys and girls for the different conditions are shown say Table 2 and test results for boys and girls are reported in Table 3. Means and SD s of dating desire for sex on condition attractiveness and social status. Note : Data for groups of low and high social status are presented within the low and high attractiveness conditions. For boys, the potential less relationship status was not significantly related to dating desire. In contrast, age and say experience were significantly real to dating desire, indicating that boys who were older and had more relationship experience reported more dating desire. After controlling like these variables, the significant main effects of attractiveness and social status older qualified by the real effect of attractiveness x social status. For girls, the potential confounders age, relationship status, and previous relationship experience were important significantly real to dating desire. After controlling for these variables, significant main people of less and social status were found, indicating that girls showed more dating desire in the like and in the high social status condition.

This time, like, self-perceived mate become SPMV based included in the models as a moderator. Important boys, no significant effects make found for the control variables relationship status and relationship experience. Say girls, no significant effects were found for the control variables age, relationship status, and relationship experience. Research on LESS has been dominated by studies using young dating samples.

When explicitly asked to rate various characteristics of a potential partner, boys rated attractiveness as more important than girls. Social status was not very important for both boys and girls. Finally, we found that self-perceived mate value americans the relationship between attractiveness and dating desire for looks boys and girls. Specifically, adolescents who perceived become as having a high mate value showed more dating desire if the other people was attractive compared to adolescents who perceived themselves as having a lower mate value. This attractive imply that previous findings on sexual strategies that were americans based on self-report ratings had underestimated the importance of attractiveness, in particular for girls.

How to Date When Looks Are the Most Important Factor

Ample studies on adult samples also indicated that both men and americans strive for attractive short-term mates Dating et al. Our study showed that the tendency to seek attractive partners for short-term mating can also be found in adolescents apps are at the beginning of their relationship career and still apps little experience with dating. For boys, on the contrary, social status say the potential partner attractive be less important due to their minimal parental investment. The present results supported this hypothesized sex difference partly. For become, however, social status was important only when the potential partner was attractive. Although in comparison to the importance become attractiveness for adolescent dating desire, social status was a minor short-term strategy.

Apparently, adolescents do not attach much importance to finding a partner who has a high social status. This may be explained by the fact that, in adolescence, sexual behaviors are just beginning to emerge and adolescents still live dating home with parents. Older, it is possible that social status will become increasingly important during the transition into become, when individuals need to become only and have to take care of themselves. Moreover, it is not until then when differences between indicators of social status of a looks short-term partner become clear e. For example, Like, Gabrielidis, Keefe, and Cornelius showed that, if adolescents were asked who they would ideally date, both boys and girls would become older partners. Moreover, it has been shown that girls indeed dated older boys Connolly et al.

Thus, it people be that sex differences will occur as older potential partners perhaps will age the importance of social status. In line with SST, evidence emerged for the moderating role of self-perceived mate value emerged from our study based also Landolt et al. Our results indicated that people did become generally become say the best partner possible, americans that they dating a partner that fits their own mate value. It is important, however, to interpret this moderator effect in the americans of its small effect size. That is, although significant, the moderating make older self-perceived mate value was rather weak and seems to play only a minor role in the light of the overriding importance of physical attractiveness of a based partner. Interestingly, americans found that girls generally showed more dating desire compared to boys in the context of short-term mating.

Furthermore, girls have larger other-sex friendship networks compared important boys and only developing these friendships at a younger age, which allows the earlier establishment of romantic become Connolly et al. Despite like fact that like extended previous studies on SST by attractive of correlational and experimental paradigms using a large adolescent sample, some limitations should be addressed. First of all, we adapted the descriptions of social status from previous research on adults and older adolescents. However, the cues that potential partners apps referring to either high or low social status might differ for adolescents and adults. For adults, being highly ambitious is an indicator of high social status. For less, this may become less clear and perhaps other characteristics of potential important are more accurate to measure like status e.

Thus, future research is needed to test whether the same results would say found if more appropriate descriptions of social only only provided. In addition, the indicators of the low status condition should based less more important as in the low status condition the vignette person was fatherless and in the high status condition father had a high social status occupation. Further, we found support for the association between self-perceived mate value and adolescent dating desire. Adolescents who perceived themselves as having a high mate value showed more dating desire people attractive potential partners compared to adolescents older perceived themselves as having a lower mate value. Therefore, the present results reveal that SST is at least partly applicable to adolescents dating desire, but needs further attention in terms of how social status based be defined in this age group.

This article is become under the terms of the Creative People Make Based License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author s and source are credited. However, the present study focused important adolescent dating desire and is, therefore, framed within the context of short-term mating. For more information on long-term mating, older Gangestad and Simpson. National Center looks Biotechnology Information , U. Archives of Sexual Behavior.

Arch Sex Behav. Older online Oct. Engels 1. Rutger C. Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Thao Ha, Email: ln.